United States v. Sanjurjo

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2009·No. 09-6590·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID SANJURJO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00338-RLW-1)

Submitted: August 31, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-

00338-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanjurjo, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Sanjurjo (United States v. Sanjurjo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related