United States v. Sanjurjo

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sanjurjo

329 F. App'x 500

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. 09-6600·Unpublished

Opinion

*501 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district eourt. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-RLW-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*501 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Sanjurjo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district eourt. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-RLW-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sanjurjo, 329 F. App'x 500 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 500 (United States v. Sanjurjo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related