United States v. Samuel

408 F. App'x 728
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2011·No. No. 10-7423·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell W. Samuel appeals a district court order denying his motion to reconsider the order granting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The district court found it was without jurisdiction, citing United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010). We conclude the court correctly denied Samuel’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Samuel, 408 F. App'x 728 (4th Cir. 2011).

408 F. App'x 728 (United States v. Samuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)