United States v. Samuel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuel

398 F. App'x 905

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2010·No. No. 10-6746·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Darrell W. Samuel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an order compelling the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion on his behalf and request a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Samuel, No. 3:94-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. May 11, 2010). We dispense [906]*906with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Darrell W. Samuel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking an order compelling the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion on his behalf and request a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Samuel, No. 3:94-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. May 11, 2010). We dispense [906]*906with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.AFFIRMED

United States v. Samuel, 398 F. App'x 905 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

398 F. App'x 905 (United States v. Samuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.