United States v. Roseboro

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Roseboro. Read the opinion of the Court — 551 F.3d 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2009·No. 09-7035·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7035

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDWARD ROSEBORO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:02-cr-00137-MR-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 2, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Gleason, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Edward Roseboro appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Roseboro, No. 3:02-cr-

00137-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Roseboro, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Roseboro (United States v. Roseboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related