United States v. Rooks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rooks. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 F.3d 204
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2008·No. 08-7543·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALPHELIOUS ANTOINE ROOKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2)

Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: October 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphelious Antoine Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.

2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-

00312-RLW-2 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rooks, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Rooks (United States v. Rooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related