United States v. Rooks

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rooks

297 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2008·No. No. 08-7543·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2 (E.D.Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2 (E.D.Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rooks, 297 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

297 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Rooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related