United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson

First Circuit

United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson

208 F.3d 8, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6288, 2000 WL 347128

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 6, 2000·No. 99-1697·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

[9]*9ORDER OF COURT

The panel of judges that rendered the decision in this case having voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for the holding of a rehearing en banc having been carefully considered by the judges of this Court in regular active service and a majority of said judges not having voted to order that the appeal be heard or reheard by the Court en banc, the Court being equally divided,

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[9]*9ORDER OF COURT

The panel of judges that rendered the decision in this case having voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for the holding of a rehearing en banc having been carefully considered by the judges of this Court in regular active service and a majority of said judges not having voted to order that the appeal be heard or reheard by the Court en banc, the Court being equally divided,

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.

United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson, 208 F.3d 8, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6288, 2000 WL 347128 (1st Cir. 2000).

Pincite

208 F.3d 8 (United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related