United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson

208 F.3d 8, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6288, 2000 WL 347128
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2000
Docket99-1697
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 208 F.3d 8 (United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ronald Woodrum A/K/A David Wilson, 208 F.3d 8, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6288, 2000 WL 347128 (1st Cir. 2000).

Opinions

[9]*9ORDER OF COURT

The panel of judges that rendered the decision in this case having voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for the holding of a rehearing en banc having been carefully considered by the judges of this Court in regular active service and a majority of said judges not having voted to order that the appeal be heard or reheard by the Court en banc, the Court being equally divided,

It is ordered that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 F.3d 8, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6288, 2000 WL 347128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-woodrum-aka-david-wilson-ca1-2000.