United States v. Ronald Sterling Dawson, AKA Kenneth Sterling Dawson

350 F.2d 396, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 1965
Docket15987_1
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 350 F.2d 396 (United States v. Ronald Sterling Dawson, AKA Kenneth Sterling Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ronald Sterling Dawson, AKA Kenneth Sterling Dawson, 350 F.2d 396, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650 (6th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a direct appeal from a conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen automobile in violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312.

After perfecting this appeal and posting $20,000 surety bond, appellant fled the jurisdiction of the District Court. The bond has been forfeited. As of oral argument on this appeal, appellant had not been apprehended.

The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal, arguing that the facts recited indicate that the appeal is both frivolous and moot.

On consideration of appellee’s motion and the oral arguments and briefs filed in this case, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed thirty days from date on both grounds previously recited, unless in the meantime appellant has submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court. Eisler v. United States, 338 U.S. 189, 69 S.Ct. 1453, 93 L.Ed. 1897 (1949), cert. dismissed, 338 U.S. 883, 70 S.Ct. 181, 94 L.Ed. 542 (1949); Smith v. United States, 94 U.S. 97, 24 L.Ed. 115 (1876); Stern v. United States, 249 F.2d 720 (C.A. 2, 1957).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Smith
49 F. App'x 599 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. David W. Lanier
123 F.3d 945 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Patricia Coleman
834 F.2d 172 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Danny A. MacIas
519 F.2d 697 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Dorrough v. Estelle
497 F.2d 1007 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Jerry Mack Dorrough v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Tdc
497 F.2d 1007 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Neal Ruetz v. Russell E. Lash, Warden
500 F.2d 1225 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Michael Allen Swigart
490 F.2d 914 (Tenth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. John Paul Shelton
482 F.2d 848 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Garland Rex Brinlee, Jr. v. United States
483 F.2d 925 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Felix Lindsey O'Neal
453 F.2d 344 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
Johnson v. Laird
432 F.2d 77 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
No. 25383
432 F.2d 77 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Jessey Kenneth McKinney v. United States
403 F.2d 57 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 F.2d 396, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-sterling-dawson-aka-kenneth-sterling-dawson-ca6-1965.