Eisler v. United States

338 U.S. 189, 69 S. Ct. 1453, 93 L. Ed. 2d 1897, 93 L. Ed. 1897, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2085
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 27, 1949·No. 255·Published·Cited by 116 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Petitioner’s flight from the country after the grant of his petition for writ of certiorari and after the submission of his cause on the merits necessitates a decision as to the disposition now to be made of this case. Since the petitioner by his own volition may have rendered moot any judgment on the merits, we must, as a matter of our own practice, decide whether the submission should be set aside and the writ of certiorari dismissed or whether we should postpone review indefinitely by ordering the case removed from the docket, pending the return of the fugitive.

Our practice, however, has been to order such cases to be removed from the docket. Smith v. United States, 94 U. S. 97; Bonahan v. Nebraska, 125 U. S. 692. We adhere to those precedents. Accordingly after this term the cause will be left off the docket until a direction to the contrary shall issue.

While Mr. Justice Burton has not participated in the consideration of the merits of this case, he has participated in this procedural action based upon the memorandum filed by the United States of America calling the attention of the Court to the petitioner’s flight from justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eisler v. United States, 338 U.S. 189, 69 S. Ct. 1453, 93 L. Ed. 2d 1897, 93 L. Ed. 1897, 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2085 (1949).

338 U.S. 189 (Eisler v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Polanski v. Superior Court
180 Cal. App. 4th 507 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
State v. Raiburn
171 P.3d 654 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2007)
Qian Gao v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General
481 F.3d 173 (Second Circuit, 2007)
Demery v. Arpaio
378 F.3d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
People v. Uboh
2004 NY Slip Op 50766(U) (New York Supreme Court, Queens County, 2004)
People v. Fields
2004 NY Slip Op 50640(U) (New York Supreme Court, Queens County, 2004)
State v. Fisher
721 A.2d 291 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
United States v. Barnette
129 F.3d 1179 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Degen v. United States
517 U.S. 820 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Messa v. Rubin
897 F. Supp. 883 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
State v. Braun
516 N.W.2d 740 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1994)
Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States
507 U.S. 234 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Van Cauwenberghe
934 F.2d 1048 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
People v. Brych
203 Cal. App. 3d 1068 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
Green v. Drexler
760 F.2d 406 (Second Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Sharpe
470 U.S. 675 (Supreme Court, 1985)