United States v. Danny A. MacIas
This text of 519 F.2d 697 (United States v. Danny A. MacIas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
It appearing to this Court that appellant has fled jurisdiction of the district court after perfecting appeal, and his bond has been forfeited, this appeal must be dismissed as both frivolous and moot. (See United States v. Dawson, 350 F.2d 396 (6th Cir. 1965); Brinlee v. United States, 483 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Shelton, 482 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1075, 94 S.Ct. 591, 38 L.Ed.2d 482 (1973); Johnson v. Laird, 432 F.2d 77, 78 (9th Cir. 1970).) Unless appellant submits himself to the jurisdiction of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order, the dismissal of this appeal shall be deemed final and no motion for reinstatement shall be entertainable. See United States v. Shelton, 508 F.2d 797 (5th Cir. 1975); and compare Johnson v. Laird, 435 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir. 1970).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 F.2d 697, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-danny-a-macias-ca9-1975.