United States v. Rodriguez
This text of 365 F. App'x 558 (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Alfredo Rodriguez, Jr., raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Jimenez, 323 F.3d 320, 322 (5th Cir. 2003), which upheld the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 as a valid exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 F. App'x 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2010.