United States v. Avila
This text of United States v. Avila (United States v. Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-50553 Document: 00516640151 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/09/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-50553 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ February 9, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Carlos Avila,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:21-CR-49-8 ______________________________
Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Carlos Avila pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess at least 50 grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 200 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s application of the two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(5) for importation of methamphetamine,
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-50553 Document: 00516640151 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/09/2023
No. 22-50553
arguing that there was no evidence to show that he knew the methamphetamine was imported. The Government has moved for summary affirmance or, alternatively, an extension of time to file a brief. As Avila acknowledges, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Serfass, 684 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the § 2D1.1(b)(5) enhancement applies “regardless of whether the defendant had knowledge of [the drug] importation.” Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Avila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avila-ca5-2023.