United States v. Rodriguez
Opinion
Counsel appointed to represent Ramona Rodriguez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a pro se appellate brief in response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the briefs and [254]*254the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
195 F. App'x 253 (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.