United States v. Rodriguez
This text of 86 F. App'x 707 (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rolando Rodriguez pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. Rodriguez’s offense level was enhanced for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Rodriguez appeals the two-level enhancement.
The district court’s factual finding of obstruction of justice is plausible in light of the record as a whole. Thus, the obstruction finding was not clearly erroneous. See United States. v. Huerta, 182 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir.1999).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 F. App'x 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2004.