United States v. Rodriguez

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40822 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HERBERT RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1772-ALL --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Herbert Rodriguez appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Rodriguez

concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 239-47 (1998). Apprendi did

not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40822 -2-

489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.

2000). Therefore, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.