United States v. Rodriguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 F. App'x 355
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2006·No. 05-20200·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20200 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMONA RODRIGUEZ, also known as Monica,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-291-8 --------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Ramona Rodriguez has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a

pro se appellate brief in response to counsel’s motion to

withdraw. Our independent review of the briefs and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)