United States v. Robinson

228 F. App'x 738
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2007·No. No. 06-10222·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vernon Robinson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and access device fraud and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2) and 2.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Robinson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Robinson filed a pro se supplemental brief. The Government did not file an answering brief.

We have reviewed the briefs and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (appeal waiver valid when entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, 228 F. App'x 738 (9th Cir. 2007).

228 F. App'x 738 (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)