United States v. Robinson
This text of 228 F. App'x 738 (United States v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Vernon Robinson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and access device fraud and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2) and 2.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Robinson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Robinson filed a pro se supplemental brief. The Government did not file an answering brief.
We have reviewed the briefs and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (appeal waiver valid when entered into knowingly and voluntarily).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 F. App'x 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robinson-ca9-2007.