United States v. Robinson
This text of 324 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Thomas Bradford Robinson appeals from the 151-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Robinson contends that his sentence is unreasonably long in light of his age, lack of violent history, and efforts at rehabilitation. In light of the totality of the circumstances, including Robinson’s extensive criminal history, his bottom-of-the-Guidelines range sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robinson-ca9-2009.