United States v. Robinson

242 F. App'x 277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 F.3d 357
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2007·No. 06-51420·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

James Michael Robinson appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release, arguing that his 24-month sentence was unreasonable. The district court twice modified Robinson’s terms of release, but Robinson continued to violate the terms of his supervision. The record reflects that the district court properly considered the 18 *278 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Robinson’s sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001). Robinson’s sentence, which was the statutory maximum, was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, 242 F. App'x 277 (5th Cir. 2007).

242 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States of America v. Modesto Gonzalez
250 F.3d 923 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Pepper Sue Hinson
429 F.3d 114 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)