United States v. Robinson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 F.3d 357
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2005·No. 05-10003·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10003 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

RUSSELL ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-104-ALL-A --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Russell Robinson has

requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Robinson has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but

has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Robinson (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)