United States v. Robinson

115 F. App'x 246
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2004·No. 04-50501·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kevin Doral Robinson raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, 115 F. App'x 246 (5th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 246 (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)