United States v. Robinson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 F. App'x 375
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2008·No. 08-7158·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7158

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DJAN RICARDO ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00019-REP-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 30, 2008

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Djan Ricardo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Djan Ricardo Robinson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Robinson, No. 3:98-cr-00019-REP-1 (E.D.

Va. June 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Robinson (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related