United States v. Robinson

205 F. App'x 978
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 F. App'x 389
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2006·No. 05-4949·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Urain Alexander Robinson was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (2000), and sentenced to 210 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Robinson asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

This court reviews the factual findings underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, and the district court’s legal determinations de novo. See Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). When a suppression motion has been denied, this court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. See United States v. Seidman, 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir.1998).

With these standards in mind, and having reviewed the transcript of the suppression hearing and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, 205 F. App'x 978 (4th Cir. 2006).

205 F. App'x 978 (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ornelas v. United States
517 U.S. 690 (Supreme Court, 1996)
United States v. Harry Seidman
156 F.3d 542 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)