United States v. Robinson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 F. App'x 166
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2003·No. 02-7838·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-12, CA-99-130-5)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 18, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003

WL 431659 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662), at *10; 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c) (2000). We also deny Robinson’s motion to hold the case

in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robinson, (4th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Robinson (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related