United States v. Robinson
10 F. App'x 93
Opinion
Mark D. Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for resentencing. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robinson, No. CR-95-176 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Robinson, 10 F. App'x 93 (4th Cir. 2001).
10 F. App'x 93 (United States v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.