United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills
This text of 152 F.3d 1324 (United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court sua sponte grants rehearing to make the following change to the opinion published at 138 F.3d 928.
The following text, published at 138 F.3d at 931-32, is deleted:
First American rounded out the scheme in 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation; there, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of “breaker flights” 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.
The deleted text is replaced with the following:
In 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of unreported flights 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.
In all other respects the published opinion remains unchanged. The petitions of the United States, Margie Mills, and Jack Mills for panel rehearing are DENIED.
OPINION MODIFIED ON REHEARING; PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-jack-mills-margie-b-mills-ca11-1998.