United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills
152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 1, 1998·No. 96-8594·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The court sua sponte grants rehearing to make the following change to the opinion published at 138 F.3d 928.
The following text, published at 138 F.3d at 931-32, is deleted:
First American rounded out the scheme in 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation; there, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of “breaker flights” 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.
The deleted text is replaced with the following:
In 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of unreported flights 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.
In all other respects the published opinion remains unchanged. The petitions of the United States, Margie Mills, and Jack Mills for panel rehearing are DENIED.
OPINION MODIFIED ON REHEARING; PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills, 152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264 (11th Cir. 1998).
152 F.3d 1324 (United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paul Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of the State of Alabama
114 F. 4th 1241 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Shawn M. Hernandez
488 F. App'x 394 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Chante Hayes
Eighth Circuit, 2009
United States v. Hayes
574 F.3d 460 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Denver H. Linville
228 F.3d 1330 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)