United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills

152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 1998
Docket96-8594
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 152 F.3d 1324 (United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills, 152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264 (11th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The court sua sponte grants rehearing to make the following change to the opinion published at 138 F.3d 928.

The following text, published at 138 F.3d at 931-32, is deleted:

First American rounded out the scheme in 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation; there, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of “breaker flights” 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.

The deleted text is replaced with the following:

In 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of unreported flights 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.

In all other respects the published opinion remains unchanged. The petitions of the United States, Margie Mills, and Jack Mills for panel rehearing are DENIED.

OPINION MODIFIED ON REHEARING; PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING DENIED.

5

One such flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.

5

An unreported flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of the State of Alabama
114 F. 4th 1241 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Shawn M. Hernandez
488 F. App'x 394 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Chante Hayes
Eighth Circuit, 2009
United States v. Hayes
574 F.3d 460 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Denver H. Linville
228 F.3d 1330 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F.3d 1324, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 1998 WL 556264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-robert-jack-mills-margie-b-mills-ca11-1998.