United States v. Robert Goins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EARL GOINS, a/k/a Robert Earl,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3)

Submitted: April 4, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016

Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Goins appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

United States v. Goins, No. 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29,

2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED