United States v. Robert Goins

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2015·No. 15-6760·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EARL GOINS, a/k/a Robert Earl,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3)

Submitted: September 15, 2015 Decided: October 6, 2015

Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Goins filed an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012)

motion for reduction of his sentence. The U.S. Probation Office

filed a report recommending that the district court deny the

motion. Apparently mistaking this report for an order denying

the motion, Goins noted this appeal. The district court has

issued no ruling pertaining to Goins’ motion. Because there has

been neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order entered in this case, we dismiss the appeal for

want of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Robert Goins, (4th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Robert Goins (United States v. Robert Goins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related