United States v. Rice

326 F. App'x 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rice. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 F. App'x 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2009·No. No. 09-6296·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eugene Rice appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration of an order finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Rice, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-9, 2009 WL 51321 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with [692]*692oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rice, 326 F. App'x 691 (4th Cir. 2009).

326 F. App'x 691 (United States v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related