United States v. Rice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6296

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONALD EUGENE RICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:90-cr-00310-GRA-9)

Submitted: June 3, 2009 Decided: June 17, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Eugene Rice, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eugene Rice appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions for reconsideration of an order finding him

ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Rice, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-9 (D.S.C.

Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED