United States v. Reyes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6760

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWIN ARNOLDO REYES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Arnoldo Reyes, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edwin Arnoldo Reyes appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion to construe his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)

(2006) motion as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.

In his informal brief, Reyes challenges an earlier order denying

his § 3582 motion. Assuming that Reyes has properly appealed

this order, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Reyes, No. 8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20 (D. Md.

Mar. 8, 2010). We deny Reyes’ motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED