United States v. Reyes

431 F. App'x 232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Reyes. Read the opinion of the Court — 340 F. App'x 868
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2011·No. No. 10-7603·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Arnoldo Reyes appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based upon Amendment 503 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review an order granting or denying a § 3582(c)(2) motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010). Under § 3582(c)(2), the district court may modify the term of imprisonment “of a defendant who has been sentenced ... based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered.” Here, Reyes’ sentencing range was not lowered, as Reyes was sentenced after the amendment in question became effective. As such, § 3582 is inapplicable. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Reyes, 431 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2011).

431 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Munn
595 F.3d 183 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)