United States v. Reliford
This text of United States v. Reliford (United States v. Reliford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40475 c/w No. 99-40477
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ERIC JEROME RELIFORD,
Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-67-1 -------------------- March 1, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric
Jerome Reliford has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reliford
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Reliford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reliford-ca5-2000.