United States v. Reed
This text of 273 F. App'x 401 (United States v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cecil Earl Reed appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Reed was sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment and *402 three years of supervised release. Reed argues that the district court erred in imposing an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6), which provides for a four-level increase if firearms are possessed in connection with another felony offense, in this case, drug possession. Reed asserts that there was an insufficient nexus between the firearm and the drug offense.
Under the law of this circuit set forth in United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 511 (5th Cir.1997), and United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1194 (5th Cir.1994), the § 2K2.1(b)(6) enhancement was appropriate. Reed’s firearm was located in close proximity to both Reed himself and the drugs. Additionally, because the firearm was underneath Reed’s seat, it was “readily available to [Reed] to protect his drug-related activities” and had the potential of facilitating his drug-related activities. Condren, 18 F.3d at 1200; § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14(A)). Therefore, the imposition of the enhancement was not erroneous. See Armstead, 114 F.3d at 511-12; Condren, 18 F.3d at 1199-1200.
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 F. App'x 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-reed-ca5-2008.