United States v. Razor

19 C.M.A. 570, 19 USCMA 570, 42 C.M.R. 172, 1970 CMA LEXIS 796, 1970 WL 7030
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided July 17, 1970·No. No. 22,891·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

We granted review of the accused’s conviction, on his plea of guilty of several offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, by a military judge sitting without court members. The Question presented is whether the accused was prejudiced by the judge’s examination of the sentence provision of a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority. We considered the question in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970). For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, we affirm the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review.

Judge DARDEN concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Razor, 19 C.M.A. 570, 19 USCMA 570, 42 C.M.R. 172, 1970 CMA LEXIS 796, 1970 WL 7030 (cma 1970).

19 C.M.A. 570 (United States v. Razor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Key
55 M.J. 537 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2001)
United States v. Phillipson
30 M.J. 1019 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1990)
United States v. Stevens
21 M.J. 619 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1985)
United States v. Rich
12 M.J. 661 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1981)
United States v. Tschida
1 M.J. 997 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Morrell
2 M.J. 479 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1975)
United States v. Villa
19 C.M.A. 564 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)