United States v. Randolph

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6156

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VERNELL BROWN RANDOLPH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00024-JBF-TEM-1)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 27, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernell Brown Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vernell Brown Randolph appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on her third motion for reduction of

sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Randolph, No. 4:04-cr-00024-JBF-TEM-1

(E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 2010). We deny Randolph’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED