United States v. Randolph
This text of 518 F. App'x 230 (United States v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Albert Randolph appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for sentencing transcripts. The district court’s order was entered on November 26, 2012. However, on January 22, 2013, [231]*231the district court granted Randolph’s subsequent motion for sentencing transcripts. As Randolph has already received the relief he seeks, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We deny Randolph’s motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 F. App'x 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-randolph-ca4-2013.