United States v. Randall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7982

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLIFF BERNARD RANDALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cr-00583-TLW-9)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cliff Bernard Randall, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cliff Bernard Randall appeals the district court’s

order granting Randall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion

for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randall,

No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-9 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 7, 2009, entered Oct.

8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED