United States v. Randall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7285

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JERON RONDELL RANDALL,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00058-H-2)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeron Rondell Randall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeron Rondell Randall appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randall,

No. 4:95-cr-00058-H-2 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED