United States v. Rainey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

QUINTON D. RAINEY, a/k/a Q,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-00069-RBS-l)

Submitted: December 18, 2008 Decided: January 9, 2009

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton D. Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Quinton D. Rainey appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 4:94-cr-

00069-RBS-l (E.D. Va. May 21, 2008; July 1, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED