United States v. Rainey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARLIN RAINEY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Robert Eric Friedman, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marlin Rainey appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment.”

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D.

Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED