United States v. Raimer

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2005·No. 04-7691·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7691

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID A. RAIMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Raimer, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Raimer appeals the district court’s orders denying

his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(b), (c) (West 2000 &

Supp. 2004), and his motion to reconsider that denial. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court.

See United States v. Raimer, Nos. CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3 (S.D.W.

Va. filed July 29, 2004 & entered July 30, 2004; Aug. 24, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Raimer, (4th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Raimer (United States v. Raimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related