United States v. Raimer

122 F. App'x 653

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Raimer appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(b), (c) (West 2000 & Supp.2004), and his motion to reconsider that denial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Raimer, Nos. CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3 (S.D.W. Va. filed July 29, 2004 & entered July 30, 2004; Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED