United States v. Rahmani
This text of 446 F.3d 915 (United States v. Rahmani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The order filed April 17, 2006, denying the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is amended as follows:
After the sentence, “The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration,” insert the following sentence: “Judge Fisher and Judge Berzon were recused from all proceedings in this case.”
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Judge Fisher and Judge Berzon were recused from all proceedings in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rahmani-ca9-2006.