United States v. Rahmani
This text of United States v. Rahmani (United States v. Rahmani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 02-50355 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CR-01-00209-RMT HOSSEIN AFSHARI, aka Hosseini Central District Deklami; et al., of California, Defendants-Appellees. Los Angeles
ORDER
Filed June 17, 2005
Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion filed December 20, 2004, and appearing at 392 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2004), is withdrawn. Pursuant to General Order 5.3.a, an opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order. With the withdrawal and substitution of the opinion, the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40 now controls.
7241 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rahmani, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rahmani-ca9-2005.