United States v. Rahmani

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rahmani. Read the opinion of the Court — 412 F.3d 1071
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2005·No. 02-50355·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 02-50355 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CR-01-00209-RMT HOSSEIN AFSHARI, aka Hosseini  Central District Deklami; et al., of California, Defendants-Appellees. Los Angeles

 ORDER

Filed June 17, 2005

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed December 20, 2004, and appearing at 392 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2004), is withdrawn. Pursuant to General Order 5.3.a, an opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order. With the withdrawal and substitution of the opinion, the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are denied as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40 now controls.

7241 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rahmani, (9th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Rahmani (United States v. Rahmani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.