United States v. Privott

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Privott

473 F. App'x 293

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2012·No. No. 12-6557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Devon Privott appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Privott, No. 2:03-cr-00172-AWA-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 12, 2012 & entered Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument [294]*294because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Devon Privott appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Privott, No. 2:03-cr-00172-AWA-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 12, 2012 & entered Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument [294]*294because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Privott, 473 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 293 (United States v. Privott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related