United States v. Privott

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6310

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANDREW LEWIS PRIVOTT,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00090-JBF-FBS-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Lewis Privott, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andrew Lewis Privott appeals the district court’s

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a) motion to correct

purported errors in his presentence investigation report

(“PSR”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See

United States v. Privott, No. 2:02-cr-00090-JBF-FBS-1 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED