United States v. Powers (In Re Powers)

28 B.R. 86
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 26, 1983
Docket19-11791
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 28 B.R. 86 (United States v. Powers (In Re Powers)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Powers (In Re Powers), 28 B.R. 86 (Pa. 1983).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

This case reaches the Court on the complaint of the United States, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, for relief from the stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(7). The debtor is liable to the I.R.S. in the sum of $1,406.50 for unpaid taxes for the 1980 tax year. The debtor is entitled to a refund for the 1981 tax year in the amount of $757.00. The I.R.S. has filed the instant complaint to obtain relief from the stay in order to setoff this refund against the unpaid tax liability.

A party with a right of setoff may retain funds until the issue is decided. In re Murry, 15 B.R. 325 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Ark.1981); 11 U.S.C. § 542(b). Although the debtor is entitled to a refund for the 1981 tax year, the Internal Revenue Service has a valid right of setoff against this fund. 26 U.S.C. § 6402(a); 11 U.S.C. § 106(b). A right of setoff is similar to a secured claim under the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 506(a). The Court will grant relief from the stay where a secured claim or a right of setoff is not adequately protected. 11 U.S.C. § 362(d). The debtor has the burden *87 of proving that such a claim is adequately protected. 11 U:S.C. § 362(g). In this case, the debtor produced no evidence of adequate protection. The debtor, having failed to carry the burden of proof, there is no reason to continue the stay.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 1983, in accordance with the foregoing Memorandum, it is

ORDERED that the automatic stay of proceedings against the debtor’s tax refund in the sum of $757.00 is hereby TERMINATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Woloschak Farms
74 B.R. 261 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)
Willardo v. United States (In Re Willardo)
67 B.R. 1014 (W.D. Michigan, 1986)
Mewes v. BankWest of South Dakota (In Re Mewes)
58 B.R. 124 (D. South Dakota, 1986)
In Re Conti
50 B.R. 142 (E.D. Virginia, 1985)
In Re Warden
36 B.R. 968 (D. Utah, 1984)
In Re Burrow
36 B.R. 960 (D. Utah, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 B.R. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-powers-in-re-powers-paeb-1983.